donderdag 18 december 2008

BNP parabis still interested in fortis-deal.


We all know that BNP parabis would gain a lot of influence in the Belgian and Luxembourgish financial markets. BNP parabis didn’t seem to suffer that much under the financial crisis, so for them this was almost a closed deal. However since the fortis-deal was launched a lot of this certainty disappeared. The quotation of BNP on Euronext halved and because of the bankruptcy of Madoff they lost hundreds of millions of Euros. So doubts aren’t unthinkable in such a situation. Nevertheless a spokesman of BNP parabis declared that the bank still is interested to take over parts of Fortis.
Lotte Van Meirvenne

zondag 14 december 2008

EU clears BNP Paribas deal


The EU approved the plan of BNP Paribas to buy the Belgian and Luxembourg banking arms of Fortis on Wednesday.

After BNP Paribas made the deal with the Belgian government to buy parts of Fortis, after the failure of an earlier attempt by the Belgian government to save Fortis, they became the largest holder of private savings in the euro area. At the same time the commission also cleared two statue rescues of Fortis.

To avoid a limited choice of credit card providers on the Belgian and Luxembourg markets and to comply with European antitrust laws BNP Paribas will have to sell off BNP Paribas Personal Finance Belgium in order to complete the Fortis deal.

Raf Van Bulck

Source: NRC Handelsblad

vrijdag 12 december 2008

Dismantling of Fortis has been suspended

Earlier this day, the CBFA suspended the trade of Fortis shares on the Brussels stock exchange in the awaiting of the verdict which has been announced this evening. In contrast to the verdict made by the court of law nearly a month ago, the court of appeal declared the sale/takeover in which parts of the Fortis Holding will be sold to BNP Paribas and the Dutch government, must be suspended.

The verdict is mainly due to Mischael Modrikamen, a lawyer, who represents 2,000 displeased shareholders. He, and his 2,000 shareholders, share the opinion that the decision made by the board of directors was illegal and must be prevented. In order to solve this problem, the judge has appointed 5 experts. It’s their job to examine the correctness of the sale/takeover and finally give an advice so the judge can make his final verdict.

Daan Van Parys

Bronnen: Tijd
Standaard

zaterdag 6 december 2008

Triumph after outvoting Davignon


Thousands of angry shareholders have outvoted the new Board of Directors of the Fortis Holding. The candidature of Etienne Davignon was rejected, he only got 49,91 % of the present votes.
More than 5,000 shareholders were present at the meeting in Brussels. Etienne Davignon was candidate to become president. Davignon is the man from the Belgium establishment and also a friend of Maurice Lippens, the former president of Fortis, who is held responsible for the downfall of Fortis.
For the approval of the new Board of Directors there had to be a consent in Utrecht as well as in Brussels. To legally compile the new Board, it has to count at least three members. Only two members got a majority, these are Louis-Cheung Chi Yan, representative of the Chinese bank insurer Ping An, and Karel De Boeck.

Source: De Morgen, Wednesday 3 December 2008.

Tine Van Landeghem

dinsdag 25 november 2008

Judge orders Fortis investigation

This week, on the 24th of October, a Dutch judge ordered a major independent investigation into the break-up of the Fortis group to establish if there was mismanagement. They also decided that Fortis should pay all costs related to the investigation estimated around 600,000 Euro.

The VEB (an organisation that represents the small shareholders) who took the matter to court is pleased with the decision of the Dutch company court.

Although the decision was to be expected after the outcome of a similar Belgian case earlier this month, the trade of Fortis shares on the Amsterdam and Brussels stock exchanges was suspended during the trial

Raf Van Bulck

Source: De Tijd

donderdag 20 november 2008

Key moments in the Fortis crises


17/10/2007: Fortis purchases ABN Ambro. This is the beginning of the end. The financing of this deal put the shares under a lot of pressure.
26/06/2008: Fortis announces unexpectedly that a capital increase of 1.5 billion euro is necessary and that they will have to cancel the interim-dividend. The shares lose 19%.
11/07/2008: CEO Jean-Paul Vorton resigns and Herman Verwilst takes his place.
01/08/2008: Financial director Gilbert Mittles also resigns, he is appointed ‘special adviser of the CEO’.
15/09/2008: The American Bank Lehman Brothers goes bankrupt. Because of this the Interbanking Market stops working and the rate for liquidities skyrocket.
26/09/2008: At a press conference Fortis states that there are no liquidity or solvability problems. That same night Verwilst is replaced by Filip Dierckx. It seems that the financial crises was dramatically. A lot of clients take away their money, a total of 20 million euro.
28/09/2008: The governments of Belgium, Luxemburg and the Netherlands decide to invest 11.2 billion euro in Fortis. Fortis has to sell its holding in ABN Ambro. Maurice Lippens resigns as president of the Board of Directors.
03/10/2008: The Belgium government announces that they will sell Fortis Netherlands and ABN Ambro to the government of the Netherlands for 16.8 billion euro.
06/10/2008: The Belgium government sells 75% of Fortis Bank and Fortis Insurance Belgium to BNP Paribas.


Source: De Standaard

Tine Van Landeghem

woensdag 19 november 2008

De Gucht accused of selling stocks with prior knowledge

The efforts of the government to save Fortis Holding are still causing problems. Not only are stockholders filing a complaint in order to cancel the takeover by BNP Paribas, politicians too are being criticised.

One politician in particular, K. De Gucht, is accused of giving 'sensitive' information during the negociations between the Belgian government and BNP Paribas, to his spouse, M. Schreurs. De Gucht allegedly would have told her to sell her stocks, which is regarded as an act with prior knowledge. Vlaams Belang filed a complaint against De Gucht and the CBFA as well is investigating this matter. De Gucht dennies all accusations and hopes that the court of law will do its job so there will be ‘clarity’ in this case.

Daan Van Parys

Source: Tijd